Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7045 14
Original file (NR7045 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

 

cord pursuant to the

Mut oUdaliL hee A

comments

       

Bill, ) was on 30 c : g

ame effective on
e components
summer 2008

suMMeT

 

n

 

t
x
D
wu

srning regulations,

  

nember must be on active duty : t selec =
reserve at the time of the election

yoo

important feature of the law because

  

provisions are intended as an incent
Docket No. NR7045-14

who are retired are not eligible to transfer their education
benefits.

Under these circumstances, the Board found that no relief is
warranted. Accordingly, your application has been denie
names and votes of the members of the panel will he furnishe

eee ae R et
Ups Se yte es

a eR

he

2.

mu 4

It is regretted that the circumstances of your Case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
arrer or injustice.

Sincerely,

   

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Fxecutive Director

Enclosure: CNPC meme 1780 PERE-214 0 O= £2 Sen 2+

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5990 14

    Original file (NR5990 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NR5990-14 hh Under these circumstances, the Board found that no reli is warranted. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable ma erial error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11436 14

    Original file (NR11436 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ' ROARND FOR CORRECTION OF IN Oi &S, COURTING ULSE HOA — n reference naval peaama pursuant to the provis to your applica ions section 1552. United States Code, 4 Tm AL AVM a AVAL RECORDS ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 HD Docket No: NR11436-14 bf ae Neramher 204 tion for correction of your of title 10 of the BA three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval = of Records, sitting in executive session, application on 11 December 2014 Your injustice were reviewed in accordance regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6934 14

    Original file (NR6934 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    TET Rem OTR NT , lu cin i DIP Ar PIVILIN ! A e Board for Correction of Naval Records, considered your application on sitti 19 November 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10968 14

    Original file (NR10968 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 TOE T Naeger A “ a ae a « ) + + T ME mice. seam) ) at anc 4 + nisttr EequiatClons Dbl Oo the Doc lered by Your apr ait support th naval re a Ke sar arions: es WYus Gael wide t A Jal: Ge ry Decemde2 iKen drivin enn £4 abuse rehabilitation failure and civil conviction. Finally, the Board noted that there is no evidence in the record to support your assertion.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR868 14

    Original file (NR868 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Le requ agTaLTLOMs Of erro tae HAPArAanee n accordance DUT s Amer vor your @ e; for three missing s mov r t Additionally, you were counseled and warned on t occasions that further misconduct could result in administra e diechar VE QALSCilealr due to a pattern o! New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7018 14

    Original file (NR7018 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    menmaAmrnaAchIT Mo TUG AAW Y Per Ayres oe re ore —~ - jc oT A T SisyiTe ae +4 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 10C ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 eee oats Lae. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR10600 14

    Original file (NR10600 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2014. Documentary material ed of your application, together support thereof, your naval regulations and policies 7h report of the Headquarters Marine Review Board (PERB), dated 16 After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5110 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR5110 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when fas aA months of absence a ani e e nsatisfactoz 2 serving in paygrade E-2, 3 2 4 4 r entire record and applic ly mitigating factors, § haxrmwo 2 J akeatn henefi charge and obtain benefit ny in its review o tion hed all pote your upgrade you 1 = Montgomery GI Bill. It also considered your assertions of a claim for treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), being tortured, and being passed over twice for promotion. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03838-99

    Original file (03838-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    application, together with all material applicable statutes, regulations and opinion furnished by CMC attached. ecords, sitting in executive allegations of error and injustice procedures applicable to the the Board consisted of your your naval record and considered the advisory 1999, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire rekord, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05289-99

    Original file (05289-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON M: 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 5289-99 27 January 2000 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 January 2000. Consequently, when applying for a...